ATTENTION/WARNING - NE PAS DÉPOSER ICI/DO NOT SUBMIT HERE

Ceci est la version de TEST de DIAL.mem. Veuillez ne pas soumettre votre mémoire sur ce site mais bien à l'URL suivante: 'https://thesis.dial.uclouvain.be'.
This is the TEST version of DIAL.mem. Please use the following URL to submit your master thesis: 'https://thesis.dial.uclouvain.be'.
 

To what extent is rebranding the best strategy after negative publicity?

(2022)

Files

KENNES_28701600_2022.pdf
  • Open access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 1.07 MB

KENNES_28701600_2022_APPENDIX1.pdf
  • Open access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 521.81 KB

Details

Supervisors
Faculty
Degree label
Abstract
This thesis focuses on the internal and external factors that could drive a company to use revolutionary rebranding as a strategy after negative publicity. To conduct this research a literature review was conducted. To begin, the key concepts of brand reputation, negative publicity, recovery strategy and rebranding were discussed. To arrive at the question: To what extent is rebranding the best strategy after negative publicity? In the second part, a qualitative study on the factors involved in this choice was carried out with nine stakeholders by means of semi-directive interviews. Through these interviews, elements of response to the research question were found. These elements of answer allowed us to elaborate the determining factors in this choice which are: the existing loyalty of the consumers, the competitiveness of the market, the object of the bad press as well as the change of strategy during the rebranding.

Citations

Kennes, C. (2022). To what extent is rebranding the best strategy after negative publicity? https://dial-mem.test.bib.ucl.ac.be/handle/2078.2/30132