Developing Methods for Measuring Individual Variation for Vulvar Morphology Preferences Using Factor Analysis
Files
Blackman_13891400_2024_Annexe2.pdf
UCLouvain restricted access - Adobe PDF
- 114.33 KB
Blackman_13891400_2024_Annexe3.pdf
UCLouvain restricted access - Adobe PDF
- 1.17 MB
Blackman_13891400_2024_Annexe4.pdf
UCLouvain restricted access - Adobe PDF
- 76.43 KB
Blackman_13891400_2024_Annexe5.pdf
UCLouvain restricted access - Adobe PDF
- 158.46 KB
Blackman_13891400_2024_Annexe1.pdf
UCLouvain restricted access - Adobe PDF
- 1.28 MB
Details
- Supervisors
- Faculty
- Degree label
- Abstract
- This study investigates perceptions of vulva normality and attractiveness, exploring how exposure influences these perceptions and whether they conform to or diverge from the "idealized vulva" as depicted in media and academic literature. Previous research indicates that pornography and societal norms heavily influence the idealization of a small, hairless vulva with minimal labia minora visibility and no hyperpigmentation. However, such research often overlooks the natural diversity in vulva morphology and individual preferences. To address this oversight, we developed a graphical survey tool to document and assess individual differences in perceptions of vulva normality, attractiveness, and their resemblance to the participant’s own or partner’s vulva. A sample of 386 participants rated vulva images across these dimensions, with exploratory factor analysis revealing significant variability in these perceptions. Some factors aligned with traditional ideals, while others reflected a broader acceptance of diverse traits. Additionally, greater exposure to vulvas correlated with a wider range of preferences, suggesting that familiarity may challenge normative standards. This study deepens understanding of vulva diversity and has the potential to shape medical, academic, and public discourse, ultimately contributing to an improved self-image among women by lessening the pressure to conform to narrow beauty standards.